You are here > Blog

Blog

Welcome to the blogs of the third sector research centre. Below are the most recent entries. To continue reading any of the posts, click ‘read more’. For RSS feeds on any of our blogs, click the orange icon beside the blog name, and subscribe to this feed.

Oct7

Written by:Angus McCabe
07/10/2009 14:29 

The term below (or under) the radar has come into common parlance to describe small, community based, organisations and activities in the third sector, where either the group is not registered with the Charity Commission, does not appear on other national registers (such as Companies House), or has limited and uncertain income. 

Yet, initial research by the 'below the radar' work-stream at the Third Sector Research Centre indicates that the term itself is controversial. Its use generates a range of both negative - and positive - responses.

For some, the term implies starting from a deficit model of understanding community sector organisation and activity. These groups are small and not engaged in public debate because they 'lack capacity' - lack the skills and knowledge to engage beyond their own community or circle of interest.

For others, the phrase raises the question 'whose radar'? The policy radar? The radar of local development agencies? The information technology radar? And is being on the radar useful anyway? "We are very much 'on the radar' of our community and are really active. Who else needs to know about us?"

Finally, there are those for whom being 'below the radar' is to be celebrated. Small groups and community activities can respond to local needs in a way the big agencies can't. They can take risks and find solutions to local issues that the professional organisations just can't, because they are too averse to risk taking. Such groups are independent of the state and state funding. Their agendas and purpose is not bent by the latest policy trends, they are not simply a cheap service option for public service delivery. Their importance lies elsewhere - in the social networks which are actually important to the quality of people's day to day lives.

In the current economic climate - with looming cuts in public expenditure and the loss of corporate income to large/national voluntary organisations - that independence, and lack of reliance on external funding and commissioning processes, means that just maybe below the radar is, at present, the place to be?

Tags:

6 comment(s) so far...

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

2 thoughts:
1) As a research problem, this reminded me of Heisenberg's unceratinty principle, which according to wiki "states that certain pairs of physical properties, like position and momentum, cannot both be known to arbitrary precision. That is, the more precisely one property is known, the less precisely the other can be known. This is not a statement about the limitations of a researcher's ability to measure particular quantities of a system, it is a statement about the nature of the system itself as described by the equations of quantum mechanics. According to the uncertainty principle, it is, for instance, impossible to measure simultaneously both position and velocity of a microscopic particle with any degree of accuracy or certainty."

without getting lost in quantuum physics i wonder if the broad shape gives insight. perhaps the more we know about sroi, the less we know about what volunteers value?

2) if the safest place to be is below the radar, how can we mitigate the risks to agencies of engaging with the work of TSRC?

By chris ford on  22/10/2009 14:53

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

Hi !Quite Interesting post. :)I completely agree with Chris Ford's comment - good question asked by him.With Regards Amrita

By Amrita on  17/12/2009 10:27

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

All this talk of quantum physics must have driven our blog systems into a black hole and a response to Chris's feedback was posted - and then disappeared - so thanks for the timely reminder Amrita.

Chris does indeed raise 2 important questions. If, with social return on investment, it is possible to put a financial value on everything, what is the 'value' of voluntary action? This is an issue we will be trying to unravel as TSRC evolves - but two initial (and intentionally controversial) remarks - or at least questions. Is it the case that (to borrow a phrase from Robert Kennedy) that social return on investment 'measures' everything except that which is really important? Alternatively - is voluntary action (in terms of Government and other funding regimes) a social return on no (financial) investment?

In terms of the risks to agencies (or in this case small and often informal groups) of being involved in TSRC research - there are two responses. All our in depth case study work with these groups will be anonymised - so there is a degree of protection there. But yes, there is always that research dilemma - that just by being there and working with groups, you somehow influence their direction or development. Something we need to be conscious about in the coming years - and thoughts on whether such research can ever be truly neutral would be welcome.

By Angus McCabe on  30/11/2009 15:19

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

To all TSRC bloggers out there (hopefully there will be some more!) some of the answers to the previous questions and comments are in our new briefing paper on the literature about small below the radar community groups and activities. This is available at www.tsrc.ac.uk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=7w%2bGcuXfaHQ%3d&tabid=500 (or visit the publications section of the website for this and other new publications) and a more detailed working paper will be available shortly. Enjoy - and send us your comments/thoughts please!

By Angus on  21/06/2010 14:13

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

I am currently employed to do just such a mapping exercise in a Unitary Authority and it is fascinating to see the shift in the interest in the aims of the exercise as more data begins to emerge - is it the economic value of the above and below the radar community organisations which is of most interest or their contribution to achieving strategic community plan outcomes or their potential to contribute to emerging solutions to Big Society and Scaling Up etc. etc.

It is also, in my experience, beginning to re-write the VCSE continuum conundrum - voluntary, community, social enterprise. Smallish, below the radar organisations are, in effect, becoming rather neat effective little social 'businesses' but would never consider themselves social enterprises but 'just' charitable community groups.

As I move into my in-depth case study phase I would be interested to liaise with you to see if there are any synergies which could be exploited for both sets of data.

Finally, with respect to the research neutrality and influencing issue - of course as a social research matter this is well understood and should always be acknowledged and accounted for. In terms of undertaking this work as a strategic, operational activity it is worth noting that mapping projects of third sector organisations are sometimes referred to as 'understanding in order to influence' projects - the aim is precisely to engage in order to influence. As someone who works at the 'policy into practice' and 'practice into policy' interface this is a well understood phenomena - but not a well researched one!!

Dr. Bette Baldwin
Richmond Services
www.richmond-services.co.uk
richmond.services@btinternet.com
Tel: 07967 182903





By Bette Baldwin on  20/09/2010 08:21

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

Dear Dr Bette Baldwin

Thanks for your response to ‘Below the Radar: the place to be?’. I think this neatly summarises two of the key debates within the below the radar work-stream, its reference group and in other arenas. Namely:

To what extent can/should research into the voluntary and community sector be dispassionate and value neutral as opposed to (as several participants in the debate have expressed it) providing “ammunition for the sectors voice and case to government”

Whether mapping ‘below the radar’ groups can promote “understanding in order to influence” or is a form of displacement activity and an impossible task given the fluid and changing nature of many community groups/activities.

Thank you also for the offer of liaising to explore the issues you raise and the relationships between your work and ‘below the radar’ research at the Centre. This would definitely be worth following up for, as you say, this is not a well researched area and two heads are always (or usually!) better than one. I look forward to hearing from you.

Angus McCabe
TSRC

By Angus McCabe on  21/09/2010 08:15

Your name:
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment  Cancel 
space