You are here > Blog
Oct7

Written by:Angus McCabe
07/10/2009 14:29 

The term below (or under) the radar has come into common parlance to describe small, community based, organisations and activities in the third sector, where either the group is not registered with the Charity Commission, does not appear on other national registers (such as Companies House), or has limited and uncertain income. 

Yet, initial research by the 'below the radar' work-stream at the Third Sector Research Centre indicates that the term itself is controversial. Its use generates a range of both negative - and positive - responses.

For some, the term implies starting from a deficit model of understanding community sector organisation and activity. These groups are small and not engaged in public debate because they 'lack capacity' - lack the skills and knowledge to engage beyond their own community or circle of interest.

For others, the phrase raises the question 'whose radar'? The policy radar? The radar of local development agencies? The information technology radar? And is being on the radar useful anyway? "We are very much 'on the radar' of our community and are really active. Who else needs to know about us?"

Finally, there are those for whom being 'below the radar' is to be celebrated. Small groups and community activities can respond to local needs in a way the big agencies can't. They can take risks and find solutions to local issues that the professional organisations just can't, because they are too averse to risk taking. Such groups are independent of the state and state funding. Their agendas and purpose is not bent by the latest policy trends, they are not simply a cheap service option for public service delivery. Their importance lies elsewhere - in the social networks which are actually important to the quality of people's day to day lives.

In the current economic climate - with looming cuts in public expenditure and the loss of corporate income to large/national voluntary organisations - that independence, and lack of reliance on external funding and commissioning processes, means that just maybe below the radar is, at present, the place to be?

Tags:

4 comment(s) so far...

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

2 thoughts:
1) As a research problem, this reminded me of Heisenberg's unceratinty principle, which according to wiki "states that certain pairs of physical properties, like position and momentum, cannot both be known to arbitrary precision. That is, the more precisely one property is known, the less precisely the other can be known. This is not a statement about the limitations of a researcher's ability to measure particular quantities of a system, it is a statement about the nature of the system itself as described by the equations of quantum mechanics. According to the uncertainty principle, it is, for instance, impossible to measure simultaneously both position and velocity of a microscopic particle with any degree of accuracy or certainty."

without getting lost in quantuum physics i wonder if the broad shape gives insight. perhaps the more we know about sroi, the less we know about what volunteers value?

2) if the safest place to be is below the radar, how can we mitigate the risks to agencies of engaging with the work of TSRC?

By chris ford on  22/10/2009 14:53

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

Hi !Quite Interesting post. :)I completely agree with Chris Ford's comment - good question asked by him.With Regards Amrita

By Amrita on  17/12/2009 10:27

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

All this talk of quantum physics must have driven our blog systems into a black hole and a response to Chris's feedback was posted - and then disappeared - so thanks for the timely reminder Amrita.

Chris does indeed raise 2 important questions. If, with social return on investment, it is possible to put a financial value on everything, what is the 'value' of voluntary action? This is an issue we will be trying to unravel as TSRC evolves - but two initial (and intentionally controversial) remarks - or at least questions. Is it the case that (to borrow a phrase from Robert Kennedy) that social return on investment 'measures' everything except that which is really important? Alternatively - is voluntary action (in terms of Government and other funding regimes) a social return on no (financial) investment?

In terms of the risks to agencies (or in this case small and often informal groups) of being involved in TSRC research - there are two responses. All our in depth case study work with these groups will be anonymised - so there is a degree of protection there. But yes, there is always that research dilemma - that just by being there and working with groups, you somehow influence their direction or development. Something we need to be conscious about in the coming years - and thoughts on whether such research can ever be truly neutral would be welcome.

By Angus McCabe on  30/11/2009 15:19

Re: Below the radar: the place to be?

To all TSRC bloggers out there (hopefully there will be some more!) some of the answers to the previous questions and comments are in our new briefing paper on the literature about small below the radar community groups and activities. This is available at www.tsrc.ac.uk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=7w%2bGcuXfaHQ%3d&tabid=500 (or visit the publications section of the website for this and other new publications) and a more detailed working paper will be available shortly. Enjoy - and send us your comments/thoughts please!

By Angus on  21/06/2010 14:13

Your name:
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment  Cancel 
space