You are here > Blog
Jun13

Written by:Angus McCabe
13/06/2012 13:45 

Community development is, officially at least, dead. Community engagement is no more. We are all now community organisers, doing social action. But government pronouncements about the ‘Big Society’ (apologies to all readers) and ‘communities’ do beg some questions.

What kind of social action? Is it the Occupy Movement that is wanted, non violent direct action – or is it about tenant’s painting their own front doors and running the local library as volunteers? More active citizens are needed – but this at a time when grassroots community groups are under real threat. And not only from the cuts. There is the loss of free/affordable places to meet. Less (or no) access to pro bono support and advice. It’s harder to get volunteers as people become increasingly anxious about their jobs – if they have one – and are working longer hours etc etc.

It’s all about localism and open public services – at the very time that small community groups are being excluded from even the possibility of tendering for the local services they are supposed to run.

After 30 odd (some very odd) years in the voluntary and community sector, I have days full only of despair…..and then I go down the allotment and remember. The grass roots grow everywhere – except where the gardener/bureaucrat wants them or thinks they should be.

For more discussion of these issues, join our seminar 'Working with the grassroots' on Thursday 28 June. Seminar details here

Tags:

5 comment(s) so far...

Re: Community Development is dead, long live…..?

It strikes me that we are becoming, in almost every way, like North America. At the interesting seminar above there were some genuine grass-roots activists. One woman (from a women's group) had paid her own train fare from Sheffield and left her very young baby + was thrilled to be there. But there were many 3rd sector paid staff, who spent much of the time messing about with their gadgets (no, they were not all tweeting madly about the fantastic seminar, at least 3 were surfing and answering emails). Its like our local labour party - lots of new young members, mostly white middle class men with very good hearts, in it for a career. Where are the those grassroots? With resources, they should be leading the dialogue, inviting us to be engaged, not just be coming along (if they can afford it) to listen. We need to act quickly and nurture them instead of pouring weed-killer over them. Even this seminar was a little frightening for some. Grassroots are delicate as well as experienced, skilled and sometimes very hardy. They don't exist without basic nutrition.

By annette rimmer on  01/08/2012 09:56

Re: Community Development is dead, long live…..?

Thanks for the feedback on the event Annette - and yes it was scary - and that was just for me as a presenter. The analogies of the 'weedkiller' and the importance of nurturing the grassroots are timely and important.

We do try and engage community activists and practitioners in 'below the radar' events - by moving around and only doing free sessions - but yes, that is different to getting grassroots groups too lead - or even at times inform - the discussion. There are times though when I have a (perhaps) more profound concern - namely that community activists (and indeed it feels like whol communities) are disengaging from political debate at present as the language used (despite all its impact in terms if cuts to benefits, jobs, housing rights etc) has (or is seen as having) no connection between the words and people's lived experience.

The challenge may well be in communicating clear and understandable messages that move us all on from current 'practical despair to more radical hope for the future

By Angus on  01/08/2012 13:22

Re: Community Development is dead, long live…..?

What I am hearing here is a story of cultural invasion - talk (and practice) of community engagement being disconnected from the realities of people's everyday lives, and dancing to the tune of the state, with its managerial discourse...
I have to say, though, that it is the sucking of communities into blind activism - painting doors instead of casting a critical eye over the maintenance funding regime - that renders undoubtedly well-intentioned volunteers 'do gooders', and renders the Big Society a glass half-empty.
By the way, all this talk of 'community organising...' Don't tell me government is borrowing from Sual Alinsky?!!!

By John McCormack on  09/08/2012 09:05

Re: Community Development is dead, long live…..?

'Painting doors or casting a critical eye.....' That sort of hits home at the long (some would say ancient) debate regarding the core of community development - is it about self help - or more radical political analysis? Can community development be in and against the state - or when state services, benefits etc etc are under real threat does community development need to be ' in (and with parts of) the state? Community development (whether this is encouraging or not) remains conested.

And yes - community organising has been borrowed by Government - but whether it/Alinsky is understood by government is a different matter.

By Angus McCabe on  09/08/2012 11:01

Re: Community Development is dead, long live…..?

More lively discussion on this also on the Community Development Exchange Group: linkd.in/P1HkL8

By naomi on  09/08/2012 11:10

Your name:
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment  Cancel 
space